Digital advertising insights for local political campaigns.
The complete step-by-step: Meta authorization, voter file targeting, creative that converts, budget guidance, and how to optimize your spend from launch to Election Day.
Read article →Countywide targeting, primary vs. general strategy, phase-by-phase creative, and how to concentrate budget in the window that actually moves votes.
Read article →Who needs Meta political ad authorization, how the Paid for By disclaimer works, what targeting restrictions apply, and what happens when campaigns skip the process.
Read article →Platform policies, verification requirements, AI content rules, and ad costs are shifting fast. Here's what changed and why it matters for your campaign.
Read article →The most efficient ad spend in politics targets voters who already visited your website. Most local candidates don't even know it exists.
Read article →Bigger district, bigger budget, more voter segments. Why the playbook that won your local race doesn't scale without adjustments.
Read article →Getting hit with a negative ad feels personal. Most candidates react emotionally — which is exactly the wrong move.
Read article →Primaries and generals are completely different animals. The campaign that doesn't adjust its digital strategy between them loses.
Read article →He knocked every door, planted every yard sign, and attended every fish fry. He still lost to an opponent who spent $800 on ads.
Read article →Most candidates have no idea if they're winning until the votes are counted. Data-driven campaigns know weeks in advance.
Read article →City council races are the sweet spot for digital — large enough to matter, small enough to dominate affordably.
Read article →Candidates assume voters search for their name. In reality, they search for the office, the issues, and your opponent.
Read article →This process catches every first-time candidate off guard. Start late and you lose a week of your campaign to paperwork.
Read article →A single mailer costs thousands. $500 in digital reaches the same voters multiple times across multiple platforms.
Read article →The final 72 hours of a campaign are a completely different game. Most candidates waste their closing budget running the same ads they started with.
Read article →Township races are the smallest, cheapest, and most winnable — and the most ignored digitally. That's your advantage.
Read article →Yard signs are the security blanket of local politics. Candidates count them obsessively, but they don't move votes.
Read article →Instagram is great for humanizing a candidate and terrible for direct persuasion. Here's what that means for your campaign.
Read article →Three weeks before Election Day with no digital presence? Compressed timelines require more expertise, not less.
Read article →Interruption vs. intent. Two fundamentally different approaches to reaching voters — and the answer is "it depends on your race."
Read article →Federal law, state law, and platform policy — three layers of compliance rules that most candidates don't know about until it's too late.
Read article →School board races are uniquely emotional. Low turnout, passionate parents, and zero digital competition — if you know how to exploit it.
Read article →"My district is too small for ads." "I'll just knock doors." "Facebook is free." Sound familiar? Here's why these beliefs cost elections.
Read article →Most candidates blast ads to everyone. Smart campaigns know that targeting precision beats raw budget every time.
Read article →Voters see your face, hear your voice, and connect your name to your message — all for pennies per view. Most candidates overlook it entirely.
Read article →Every ad you run points to your website. If it's slow, ugly, or confusing, you're paying to send voters to a dead end.
Read article →The #1 question every candidate asks. The answer depends on variables most campaigns don't even consider.
Read article →In a field where anyone can claim to run political campaigns, professional accountability matters — and AAPC’s Code of Ethics is why we joined.
Read article →A viral Instagram post claimed billionaires and AIPAC spent $34 million to take out Thomas Massie in KY-4. We pulled the FEC filings. The cited $34M figure and the AIPAC attribution are both wrong — verified spend is ~$9.7M and the lead anti-Massie funder was a Trump-aligned super PAC, not AIPAC. Three strategic takeaways for candidates and donors.
Read article →Cost per vote is the most useful budget-planning metric in local politics. Two real BMS data points ($0.31/vote township, sub-$0.30 county primary) plus race-shape benchmarks for any 2026 down-ballot R campaign. What drives cost per vote down vs. up.
Read article →Most county and township R organizations are sitting on email lists with 30-50% deliverability erosion and segmentation that hasn't been touched in years. The 3-phase cleansing approach that recovers reach, restores sender reputation, and grows the active subscriber base by 50%+.
Read article →Almost every first-time local R candidate launches on a hosted-template platform (GoDaddy, Wix, Squarespace). Six weeks later, the same site is the bottleneck on every other thing the campaign needs to do. SEO, analytics, ad-platform integration, donation attribution — the trap, and how to migrate out.
Read article →Most county and township R organizations send too rarely (membership forgets they exist) or too often (unsubscribes spike). Monthly is the sweet spot. The 5-section template, the discipline that makes it work, and the metrics that tell you it's landing.
Read article →Five sitting Indiana Republican state senators were defeated by Trump-backed challengers on May 5, with ~$12 million of outside spending across the seven targeted races. The story isn't about Indiana — it's about every Republican primary down-ballot in 2026. Five strategic takeaways for local R candidates.
Read article →On May 5, Newark voters rejected a 0.5% income tax (56.51% NO, second consecutive defeat) and Licking County voters rejected a 0.15% transit sales tax (57.52% NO). Three lessons for local Ohio campaigns running through 2026 and 2027.
Read article →Local races are decided in batches over four hours on election night. The candidate whose own website serves authoritative real-time results owns that traffic — and the credibility that comes with it. What it actually requires (and what it doesn't).
Read article →The Boost button on a Facebook page post does NOT prompt for the POLITICAL special-ad-category. Disapproved ads, wasted budget, a campaign in remediation when it should be running. The mechanics, the real cost, and the four-step fix.
Read article →A 5-way Republican primary won by +695 votes through strategic discipline — a positive-only paid strategy under sustained third-party attack, a full technology stack rebuild from a legacy hosted template, and active ad optimization across an eight-week cycle. Eight core moves on the digital + technology layer.
Read article →The Chicago Tribune says the Illinois GOP is vanishing. The real problem isn't candidates or money — it's that Republican campaigns don't exist online. We proved it can be fixed for $1,119.
Read article →Google lets you reach voters at the exact moment they're searching for your race. Here's why local candidates who ignore it are leaving votes on the table.
Read article →Boosting posts, targeting the whole state, and forgetting compliance. Here's what actually works for hyperlocal races.
Read article →Real results: $1,119 in ad spend, 20 days, 7 platforms, 70% of the vote. How a disciplined digital strategy delivered a 41-point win in a hyperlocal township race.
Read article →When voters Google your name and find nothing, your opponent wins by default. The numbers behind digital invisibility.
Read article →